Examine the Decisions Behind a Satisfactory Crisis Outcome

What a satisfactory outcome does not explain

An organization has survived a crisis. That matters for the review, but it does not explain how much its own decisions contributed. Other actors’ behavior and the development of the situation also influence the outcome.

For more than ten years, I have worked on this question. Initially, I concentrated on crisis management structures, roles and responsibilities. These remain relevant prerequisites. Their existence does not establish that a team acts appropriately under pressure.

Move from structures to a documented decision

The assessment therefore needs to connect the information available and the problem recognized with the decision that followed and the role receiving an actionable assignment. Reconstructing that sequence permits a reasoned discussion of whether the response fitted the situation at the time.

In an exercise, I began systematically recording observed events and results on paper lists. For me, the important step was not reducing the material to numbers, but tying an assessment to documented events. A general impression of team behavior became a question that could be discussed through particular actions.

Connect self-assessment with other perspectives

Participants’ sense that they handled an exercise well belongs in the debrief. It describes their perception. Whether the team addressed a relevant problem in time also requires comparison with the scenario’s development.

I recommend reconstructing one consequential decision and placing the participants’ assessment alongside the documented information and assignment sequence. If the perspectives differ, the discrepancy calls for investigation. It should not immediately be explained as overconfidence or an observer error.

Use the finding to identify the next development task

A traceable exercise review can identify where information processing, decision work or implementation needs closer examination. It provides development questions without attributing the entire outcome to the team.

Applying this approach to a real crisis requires reconstructable information states and operating conditions. The available records and their gaps need examination in each case. The effort required cannot be inferred from recording an exercise.

→ Crisis exercises as diagnostic instruments: Services → Exploratory P-DRIVEN comparison: Insights